The first site is nevertheless superior. It violates all your rules yet is better. The whole s greater than the sum of the parts.

Great breakdown to help me explain these principles to clients, thank you!

From mi pov, the first web is better designed. Even though the second one is prettier, the first one is focused on converting to sell. So you have a big title telling what they are and where (they are in San Francisco and they provided law services specialized in family), short comments of the services they have already provided, and two buttons, one to talk with someone or maybe send and email and other one to read testimonials from previous clients. Also the logo is there and a phone to call.

On the other hand, in the other page I only see the logo and text talking about how is their service but you can’t know more unless you start navigating the site. I’m pretty sure that the first one produces more sales than the second one

If I made the san Francisco website i’d take it personally

Hi guys, really nice video
But I have a question, how to do I get Web page templates that I can implement as a beginner in Web development (html,css,js)

Thank You…

i mean when you use language the way you do, yeah it seems like the first design was “harder” but actually the hamburger menu is always accessible on every page and has the exact same submenu system.

i think you’re speaking more to convention trends than what is actually “good” or “easy”

just wanted to point this out because i think changing our perspective on how we present this info brings us closer to an objective look at user experience

personally, i think both websites suffer from all the same design flaws.